Ever said something like this before?
“I’m a worrier.”
“I’m a fighter.”
“I’m a winner.”
“I’m a loser.”
“I’m a snacker.”
People make these “I am a —er,” statement all the time, to themselves and conversationally. It makes sense: the “—er” statements are statements of identity, and we humans like other humans to know what kind of humans we are. We also like to know what kind of humans we are.
When we know who we are and we know what we do, we know what we’re going to get. It’s a way of predicting the future, and bringing some feeling of certainty to our uncertain and very mortal worlds.
And yet, who you are and what you do aren’t the same thing at all. One is a state of being, the other is an action. Still, the identity statement is about things that you do, not things that you are. At some point you made a choice to do some worrying (or snacking, or fighting, or winning, etc.) because it served a purpose.
So, you did it again. Then it became a habit. Then the habit became deeply ingrained, automatic and unconscious, as habits do. The —er wound itself so deeply into what it’s like to be you that it became indistinguishable.
This kind of talk – “I am a —er” – takes away your power. When you identify with the thing that you do, the behavior becomes immovable. If you are that, it’s a fact and there is nothing you can do to change it. But if you do that… you can also do something else instead. It might be challenging – we get really attached to the “er” because it is predictable and safe – but it is possible.
Tangentially, the “er” identity statement has a close relative in the “I am the kind of person who…” statement. Like the er, it is fully externalized. Identity is attached to some action, or to some agreed upon external definition of what “the kind of person who…” is like and how they act. Again, it serves the purpose of predictability and safety.
The best news about all of this is that you can use this er/kind idea to your advantage, too. Once you’ve decided that you are something and tell yourself this enough times that you start to believe it, your brain will look for evidence of this prospect everywhere. Your brain doesn’t like being wrong about things. It likes patterns, because patterns are predictable and predictability is safe. This is why changing foundational identity beliefs is so hard, and why we all keep them hidden from ourselves in plain sight. To your lizard brain, when you’re right, you survive. When you’re wrong, you die. The good news is that as a conscious being, you get to choose what you’re right about.
This is not to say that if you tell yourself you are a bird, you’ll be able to fly (but who knows?), because you showed up human this time around and your human brain is really into this survival thing. In the life or death battle of ideas, though, conscious thought is central to whether you’re able to soar.